Clarifying user intent
The user might be looking for a fictional or creative article. To be safe, I should ask for clarification regarding their request or mention that I can draft a match report as a mock piece if they provide match details. I could also create a template report without asserting unverified facts. A good approach is to ask: “Do you want me to write an article? Please give details like the opponent, scorelines, and player performances.”Drafting a news piece
I have an option to present: "I can give you two versions: 1) a ready-made template to replace details; 2) a customized piece after you provide details." This should meet their needs. I want to write a brief news report of 300-400 characters, plus a data box and key points. I'll keep it concise by drafting a neutral piece with placeholders like [opponent], [score], [time], and [players]. It’s alright to use Unicode Chinese in my response, even if there are ASCII guidelines. Let's propose: "Should I go ahead and draft it?" and offer a template to fill in.Crafting a response
I should provide bullet lists and use code fences for multi-line content if necessary. However, it’s perfectly fine to just present the information directly as well. I want to make sure the format is clear and easy to read, ensuring that everything is well-organized. This approach will help make the content more digestible for the user. I'll go ahead and craft the response accordingly.
要我据这个标题写一篇国脚战报吗?为了不误写,请补充这些关键信息(有就写,没有我可留空占位):
先给你一版可直接替换细节的通稿模板,贴上数据就能发。
【新闻快讯】 利物浦球员国家队战报:罗伯逊90场里程碑率队进军世界杯 在[赛事名称/世预赛欧区][轮次/小组]的关键战中,苏格兰队以[比分]战胜[对手]。利物浦队长安德鲁·罗伯逊完成个人国家队第90次出场,他以队长身份首发出战[出场时间],在攻防两端持续贡献,[亮点:如“送出1次助攻/制造关键机会/完成多次解围”],帮助球队[结果:如“提前锁定出线名额/拿到晋级关键分”]。

【红军国脚表现】

【赛后声音】

【关键数据】
【社媒三连发】
确认以上细节后,我可以直接把模板替换成定稿,并按你常用的平台口径(官宣体/轻口语/战报体)微调。